Tacit Knowledge Mapping for Business Intelligence Analysis

Authors

  • Alisha Barqha Janna University of Science and Technology Chittagong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58776/ijitcsa.v2i3.163

Keywords:

business intelligence, data analytics

Abstract

The tacit knowledge in a higher institution, especially in university libraries, contains a series of intuition and inspiration that a librarian arises in exploring solutions to the various problems. Thus, limited sources of knowledge or information is a critical factor in the failure to provide accurate information. The main problem of the BI system is to capture tacit knowledge and use tacit knowledge as one of the data sources for data analysis to enhance the analytic results. The unstructured data can define as tacit knowledge in the form of data and information presented in the Knowledge Management System (KMS), and the cognitive business use both structured and unstructured data with highly sophisticated analytical techniques to identify, evaluate, and recommend a business plan of actions. The idea of being able to capture knowledge from different sources can be very beneficial to the BI system. This paper explored the solution to extracting tacit knowledge from librarians in order to enhance the data sources to be used in the BI by exploring the library's academic services, which use much tacit knowledge for answering questions with the requirement of data analysis as online or offline queries.

References

. “Measurement of tacit knowledge and its conversion to explicit knowledge: A case study of bolpur college library,” Annals of Library and Information Studies, vol. 69, no. 2, Jun. 2022. doi:10.56042/alis.v69i2.56625.

. “Research in area of tacit knowledge: Literature review on Tacit Knowledge,” Information and Knowledge Management, Jun. 2022. doi:10.7176/ikm/12-4-03.

. R. Kaplan and E. Yu, “Exploring the mind of the interviewer: Findings from research with interviewers to improve the survey process,” Interviewer Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective, pp. 63–76, May 2020. doi:10.1201/9781003020219-8.

. J. R. Martin, “Systemic functional linguistics (SFL): A social theory of language,” Social Theory for English for Academic Purposes, 2022. doi:10.5040/9781350229198.ch-3.

. “It’s OK to say Celtic if that’s what you mean,” How linguistics can help the historian, pp. 35–37, May 2021. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1rr6d4k.16.

. “We know more than we can tell,” The Intelligence of Intuition, pp. 1–18, Oct. 2023. doi:10.1017/9781009304887.002.

. P. Strach and K. S. Sullivan, “Solving the garbage can problem,” The Politics of Trash, pp. 112–143, Jan. 2023. doi:10.7591/cornell/9781501766985.003.0006.

. L. North, “DPUK cohort explorer: An interactive visualisation tool,” International Journal of Population Data Science, vol. 5, no. 5, Dec. 2020. doi:10.23889/ijpds.v5i5.1432.

. K. Garimella and S. Chauchard, WhatsApp Explorer: A data donation tool to facilitate research on WhatsApp., Mar. 2024. doi:10.31219/osf.io/k6qv5.

. C. Shikovets, G. Kvita, and J. Bezsmertnaya, “Business fact plan-analysis at Microsoft Power bi,” Market Infrastructure, no. 39, Jan. 2020. doi:10.32843/infrastruct39-43.

. S. Wang and T. Li, “Does provide additional categorical information generate negative utility?,” AEA Randomized Controlled Trials, Aug. 2023. doi:10.1257/rct.11875.

. Y. Ryoo, Y. Sung, and I. Chechelnytska, “What makes materialistic consumers more ethical? self-benefit vs. other-benefit appeals,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 110, pp. 173–183, Mar. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.019.

. E. Suhir, “Anticipation problems in aerospace psychology: Application of delphi method,” Open Access Journal of Astronomy, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2024. doi:10.23880/oaja-16000117.

Downloads

Published

14-11-2024

How to Cite

Janna, A. B. (2024). Tacit Knowledge Mapping for Business Intelligence Analysis. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science Applications, 2(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.58776/ijitcsa.v2i3.163